
When I started building websites, I didn’t think much about URL slugs.
Something like:
/page?id=123
or even:
/this-is-a-very-long-url-slug-with-too-many-keywords
seemed fine.
Turns out… it’s not.
After testing multiple pages and tools, I realized that bad slugs quietly hurt both SEO and user experience.
Here’s what actually works 👇
🚫 Common mistakes
Most developers:
- Use dynamic URLs with IDs
- Stuff keywords into slugs
- Make them too long
- Ignore readability
Example:
❌ /best-seo-url-guide-for-beginners-2026
❌ /page?id=928374
❌ /how-to-create-the-best-url-slug-for-seo-ranking-fast
✅ What works better
From what I’ve tested, high-performing slugs usually follow these rules:
- 3–5 words max
- Lowercase only
- Use hyphens (-), not underscores
- Include ONE main keyword
- Remove filler words (like "the", "and", "for")
Example:
✅ /seo-url-guide
✅ /slug-generator
✅ /password-generator
⚡ Why this matters
Short, clean URLs:
- Are easier to read
- Get better click-through rates
- Are easier to share
- Help search engines understand your page
🛠️ What I built
While working on multiple projects, I got tired of manually creating slugs.
So I built a simple tool to generate clean, SEO-friendly slugs instantly.
👉 https://codetooly.com/tools/slug-generator.html
💡 Final takeaway
If you’re ignoring your URL structure, you’re leaving easy SEO wins on the table.
Keep it simple.
Keep it short.
Make it readable.
United States
NORTH AMERICA
Related News
What Does "Building in Public" Actually Mean in 2026?
19h ago
The Agentic Headless Backend: What Vibe Coders Still Need After the UI Is Done
19h ago
Why I’m Still Learning to Code Even With AI
21h ago
I gave Claude a persistent memory for $0/month using Cloudflare
1d ago
NYT: 'Meta's Embrace of AI Is Making Its Employees Miserable'
1d ago
