I’m building Hermes, an AI-assisted repair workflow for broken WooCommerce stores.
The main idea is simple:
AI should not edit production directly.
WooCommerce stores can break because of plugin updates, checkout changes, payment issues, theme conflicts, or custom code. AI can help diagnose and patch problems quickly, but applying AI-generated changes directly to a live store feels risky.
So Hermes is designed around a safer loop:
- reproduce the issue in a sandbox,
- diagnose the likely cause,
- propose a fix,
- create a review packet,
- keep rollback available.
I recorded a short demo showing Hermes on a broken WooCommerce checkout flow:
I’m still early and looking for feedback from WordPress/WooCommerce developers, freelancers, agencies, and store owners.
Would you trust an AI repair workflow if it stayed sandbox-first and rollback-first?
What kind of WooCommerce breakages should it handle first?
United States
NORTH AMERICA
Related News

Master Local Fine-Tuning with "gemma-trainer"
8h ago
Building a Plugin-Free Newsletter Popup on WordPress: Custom REST Endpoint Mailchimp API v3
8h ago
ภาษาโปรแกรมมิ่งที่ syntax ง่าย ทำให้ AI หลอนน้อยลง จริงหรือ?
8h ago
How I Built a File-Timestamp-Based Feedback Loop to Enforce AI Output Quality
8h ago
GitHub Trending Digest — 2026-07-07
9h ago